Community Disaster Resilience Zones Act of 2022 This bill requires the President to continue to maintain a natural disaster assessment program that develops and maintains publicly available products to show the risk of natural hazards across the United States. Such products shall show the risk of natural hazards and include ratings and data for loss exposure, social vulnerability, community resilience, and any other element determined by the President. The President shall (1) review the underlyi…
VOTE BREAKDOWN
Final passage · 296 politicians tracked
222
YEA
71
NAY
0
PRESENT
3
NOT VOTING
BY PARTY
MONEY ON THIS BILL
Top donor industries among YEA voters vs NAY voters · lobbying activity in affected industries
⬆ YEA voters — top donor industries
⬇ NAY voters — top donor industries
◎ Lobbying activity by issue area
No bill-issue lobbying matches.
“Pts” = sum of per-member industry donation scores (% of total donations from that industry, summed across the group). Higher means that industry funds a larger share of contributions for that voting bloc.
INDIVIDUAL VOTES
Recorded positions for tracked politicians






























































































































































































































SPONSORS

Gary C. Peters
D-MI · Primary
SPONSOR FUNDING
Top industries funding Peters
TRAIL AI
The Community Disaster Resilience Zones Act of 2022 establishes designated zones to support community-level infrastructure and resilience efforts in areas vulnerable to disasters. The bill passed the House with 222 votes in favor and 71 opposed, with all 144 voting Democrats supporting it and Republicans splitting 78-71 on the measure. The legislation was signed into law during the 117th Congress.
Based on public voting records. Does not imply causation.
TIMELINE
DATA SOURCES
Bill data: Congress.gov · 117th–119th Congress (2021–present)
Vote records: House Clerk / Senate · 2021–present
Reflects public records. Does not imply causation.