R-TX·U.S. House·District 13

Ronny Jackson

jackson.house.gov ↗View in graph ↗⇄ Compare

$7.5M

raised· #97 in party

votes recorded

—

SOON

trade disclosures

votes with party

TRAIL AI

auto-generated

Jackson's funding profile is split roughly evenly between PAC and committee money (52%) and individual donors (48%), with an additional $726K in party and leadership contributions. Industry-tied donations show a concentration in agriculture (27%), defense and aerospace (13%), and commercial banking (10%), while his individual donor base includes professionals from law, securities, and defense sectors. His 331 recorded votes and absent stock trade disclosures provide the legislative record for public assessment of alignment with these donor patterns.

Based on FEC donor data and voting records. Statistical patterns only — does not imply causation.

DONOR MIX

Industry shares of CLASSIFIED contributions only · the long tail of small-dollar individual donors isn't tagged

$2.9M

tagged $

Agriculture27.0%

Party & Leadership15.6%

Single-Issue Advocacy13.9%

Defense & Aerospace12.9%

Commercial Banks9.9%

Health Services9.3%

Oil & Gas7.6%

Lawyers & Lobbyists3.9%

How to read this: percentages are shares of the 38% of contributions we can trace to an industry (via PAC names and donor employers). Most political money comes from small online donors who don't list an employer, so it can't be traced — that portion isn't shown here.

DATA SOURCES

Financial: FEC · 2022–2026 cycles

Profile: Congress.gov

Votes: House Clerk / Senate · 2021–present

Lobbying: Senate LDA · 2017–present

Trades: STOCK Act disclosures ·

live ingestion rebuilding

117th–119th Congress. Statistical patterns only.

DONOR MIX

Industry shares of CLASSIFIED contributions only · hover a slice for detail

$7.5M

classified

Agriculture27.0%

Party & Leadership15.6%

Single-Issue Advocacy13.9%

Defense & Aerospace12.9%

Commercial Banks9.9%

Health Services9.3%

Oil & Gas7.6%

Lawyers & Lobbyists3.9%

TOP SOURCES

Employers (individuals) & PACs · excludes aggregators

Individual Donors (no employer)

individuals

$1,834,466

TEAM RONNY

PAC

$981,446

AMARILLO NATIONAL BANK

corporation

$122,542

AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

PAC

$106,509

TEXAS FARM BUREAU AGFUND

PAC

$48,005

VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

PAC

$45,000

THE FARM CREDIT COUNCIL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

PAC

$41,000

PHILLIPS 66 PAC

PAC

$40,000

THE EYE OF THE TIGER POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

PAC

$40,000

SEAL PAC SUPPORTING ELECTING AMERICAN LEADERS PAC

PAC

$40,000

NATIONAL COTTON COUNCIL OF AMERICA COMMITTEE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COTTON

PAC

$40,000

AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

PAC

$40,000

RECENT ACTIVITY

Most recent recorded contributions · PAC and itemized individual donors

MANTECH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE ( A.K.A 'MANTECH PAC')

PAC · Apr 28, 2026

+$1,000

GLOBAL MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

PAC · Apr 16, 2026

+$500

RITTENHOUSE, PETER (GLOBE LIFE)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$200

SEABOARD CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

PAC · Mar 31, 2026

+$5,000

LU, ANYI (SELF-EMPLOYED)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$100

RITTENHOUSE, PETER (GLOBE LIFE)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$260

SIMILAR DONOR NETWORKS

Members funded by the same industries — overlapping donor networks may reflect shared policy interests.

Celeste Maloy

R-UT · House

AgricultureParty & LeadershipSingle-Issue Advocacy

→

Brad Finstad

R-MN · House

AgricultureParty & Leadership

HOW WE CALCULATE THIS

Donor Mix Donut

Shows PAC contributions and employer-attributed individual donations grouped by industry — as a share of classified giving only. Contributions that could not be matched to an industry are excluded from the donut but included in the dollar totals above. Advocacy/ideological PACs are excluded from industry breakdown.

What are aggregators?

WinRed, ActBlue, and similar platforms bundle contributions from many individual donors before passing them to campaigns. Because these don't represent a single entity's interests, they are excluded from the Donor Mix and Top Sources views — but they are counted in total fundraising figures.

Data sources

FEC Schedule A & bulk PAC filings · 2022–2026 cycles · Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings · 2017–present · Congress.gov / House Clerk voting records.

Important disclaimer

All data is sourced from public records. Analysis reflects statistical patterns only — it does not imply corruption, intent, or quid pro quo. Donor relationships show financial alignment, not control. Capitol Trail makes no claims about the motivations or character of any individual or organization.

SMITH, EDDIE C JR. (GRADY-WHITE)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$1,000

RITTENHOUSE, PETER (GLOBE LIFE)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$100

WILDS, BENJAMIN (RETIRED)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$238

SEYERLEIN, ROBERT (TCA)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$100

ON WISCONSIN PAC, INC.

PAC · Mar 27, 2026

+$5,000

ZANCHI, MICHAEL (NORTHSTAR ANESTHESIA)

Individual · Mar 27, 2026

+$104

ON WISCONSIN PAC, INC.

PAC · Mar 27, 2026

+$5,000

AMERICA'S MOUNTAIN PAC

PAC · Mar 26, 2026

+$5,000

BONNER, CARROLL (RETIRED)

Individual · Mar 25, 2026

+$111

BRATIC, SANDRA (RETIRED)

Individual · Mar 25, 2026

+$100

Single-Issue Advocacy

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4110 Bluebonnet Drive in St

COMING SOON

Live stock trade ingestion is being rebuilt.

We're migrating to a fresh data source for daily STOCK Act disclosures. Historical filings shown below are accurate but not currently refreshed nightly. Full real-time coverage returning shortly.

No historical stock trade disclosures on file for this member.

WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT

Lobbying is when companies, unions, and trade associations pay firms to influence laws and regulations — and the law requires them to disclose it. Every quarter, registrants file a report with Congress detailing who hired them, how much they spent, and which issues they pushed.

This page filters those filings to the industries that also fund this member's campaign. If commercial banks gave 30% of this member's donations and also filed 5,000 lobbying reports on bank-related issues last year, that's a financial pattern worth knowing about. It does not mean the member is corrupt — it means the industries paying to elect them are also paying to influence the laws they vote on.

136,088

Lobbying filings

that overlap top donor industries

$18.0B

Reported spend

across those filings

Donor industries

tracked here

2017–2026

Years covered

10 years

LOBBYING BY DONOR INDUSTRY

only industries that also fund this member

Each row = an industry that donated to this member AND has lobbyists pushing on Congress. Bar width = reported lobbying spend.

Defense & Aerospace

48,778 filings$6.0B

Health Services

46,475 filings$4.9B

Oil & Gas

16,560 filings$3.7B

Agriculture

15,305 filings$1.5B

TOP LOBBYING FIRMS

The firms doing the most spending in this member's donor industries

WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.

7 filings

$1.0B

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.

14 filings

$242.0M

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS

12 filings

$159.5M

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA

13 filings

$113.6M

AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

14 filings

$91.7M

Commercial Banks

8,039 filings$1.3B

Legal Services

931 filings$571.0M

LOBBYING SPEND BY YEAR

How much lobbyists in this member's donor industries have reported spending each year

2017

29,073$3.6B

2018

6,660$648.3M

2019

6,519$596.2M

2020

10,710$819.9M

2021

7,233$602.3M

2022

7,454$660.8M

2023

10,814$890.3M

2024

11,221$928.7M

2025

9,778$927.3M

2026

11,022$1.0B

YEARspend ($)filingsreported $

THE BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE, INC.

13 filings

AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION

13 filings

$68.7M

SOUTHERN COMPANY

21 filings

$65.9M

SOURCES & CAVEATS

Data: LDA (Lobbying Disclosure Act) quarterly filings · 2017–present

Amounts are self-reported by registrants. Issue codes are mapped from the LDA's 80+ general issue codes to our 19-industry taxonomy.

An industry showing up here means it both (a) funds this member's campaign and (b) lobbies Congress on issues affecting it. That overlap is a factual pattern, not proof of any quid-pro-quo.