
$1.6M
raised· #205 in party
0
votes recorded
—
SOONtrade disclosures
0%
votes with party
TRAIL AI
Gosar's $1.6M fundraising profile draws two-thirds from individual donors and one-third from PACs and committees, with $384K in separate party and single-issue political contributions. His industry-tied donations show concentration in firearms (16%), construction and engineering (15%), real estate (14%), and automotive sectors (11%), patterns reflected among his individual donors who work primarily in automotive, retail, and construction fields. His voting record includes 331 recorded votes with no stock trade disclosures on file.
Based on FEC donor data and voting records. Statistical patterns only — does not imply causation.
FUNDING PROFILE
Where the money comes from · what it's tied to
WHO GAVE IT
$1.6M raised
+ $527Kvia pass-through platforms (ActBlue/WinRed/party) — not counted in “raised”
WHAT IT'S TIED TO
Two views of the same $1.6M — who gave it vs whatit's tied to. (Most industry money comes from PACs, so the two don't add together.)
Top sectors: Firearms, Construction & Engineering, Real Estate
Full breakdown →DATA SOURCES
Financial: FEC · 2022–2026 cycles
Profile: Congress.gov
Votes: House Clerk / Senate · 2021–present
Lobbying: Senate LDA · 2017–present
Trades: STOCK Act disclosures · live ingestion rebuilding
117th–119th Congress. Statistical patterns only.
FERRARI, MARY (RETIRED)
Individual · Mar 25, 2026
KEITHLY, CHERYL (RETIRED)
Individual · Mar 24, 2026
HOUSE FREEDOM FUND
PAC · Mar 24, 2026
CAMPBELL, DELBERT L (DL CAMPBELL CO.)
Individual · Mar 24, 2026
NABER, VERLE F (RETIRED)
Individual · Mar 23, 2026
EVANS, BEATRICE (RETIRED)
Individual · Mar 19, 2026
NRA POLITICAL VICTORY FUND
PAC · Mar 18, 2026
ANTI-WOKE FUND
PAC · Mar 16, 2026
ANTI-WOKE FUND
PAC · Mar 16, 2026
EVANS, BEATRICE (RETIRED)
Individual · Mar 14, 2026
TAO, JESSICA (RETIRED)
Individual · Mar 14, 2026
VAN DAHM, KRIS (RETIRED)
Individual · Mar 13, 2026
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 16605 East Avenue of the Fo
+1 more
Live stock trade ingestion is being rebuilt.
We're migrating to a fresh data source for daily STOCK Act disclosures. Historical filings shown below are accurate but not currently refreshed nightly. Full real-time coverage returning shortly.
No historical stock trade disclosures on file for this member.
WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT
Lobbying is when companies, unions, and trade associations pay firms to influence laws and regulations — and the law requires them to disclose it. Every quarter, registrants file a report with Congress detailing who hired them, how much they spent, and which issues they pushed.
This page filters those filings to the industries that also fund this member's campaign. If commercial banks gave 30% of this member's donations and also filed 5,000 lobbying reports on bank-related issues last year, that's a financial pattern worth knowing about. It does not mean the member is corrupt — it means the industries paying to elect them are also paying to influence the laws they vote on.
45,348
Lobbying filings
that overlap top donor industries
$9.3B
Reported spend
across those filings
8
Donor industries
tracked here
2017–2026
Years covered
10 years
LOBBYING BY DONOR INDUSTRY
Each row = an industry that donated to this member AND has lobbyists pushing on Congress. Bar width = reported lobbying spend.
TOP LOBBYING FIRMS
The firms doing the most spending in this member's donor industries
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
7 filings
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.
14 filings
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS
12 filings
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY
15 filings
SOUTHERN COMPANY
21 filings
LOBBYING SPEND BY YEAR
How much lobbyists in this member's donor industries have reported spending each year
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
10 filings
AARP
15 filings
BOEING COMPANY
13 filings
SOURCES & CAVEATS
Data: LDA (Lobbying Disclosure Act) quarterly filings · 2017–present
Amounts are self-reported by registrants. Issue codes are mapped from the LDA's 80+ general issue codes to our 19-industry taxonomy.
An industry showing up here means it both (a) funds this member's campaign and (b) lobbies Congress on issues affecting it. That overlap is a factual pattern, not proof of any quid-pro-quo.