D-MD·U.S. House·District 8

Jamie Raskin

raskin.house.gov ↗View in graph ↗⇄ Compare

$8.2M

raised· #79 in party

votes recorded

SOON

trade disclosures

votes with party· loyal

TRAIL AI

auto-generated

Rep. Raskin's $8.2 million fundraising profile relies moderately on PACs and committees for 40 percent of contributions, with the remaining 60 percent drawn from individual donors across 5,326 contributions. Industry-tied money concentrates in labor unions (30 percent), lawyers and lobbyists (14 percent), and commercial banks (12 percent), while his individual donor base skews toward legal professionals, educators, and finance sector workers. He has cast 331 recorded votes and disclosed 2 stock trades under the STOCK Act.

Based on FEC donor data and voting records. Statistical patterns only — does not imply causation.

FUNDING PROFILE

Where the money comes from · what it's tied to

WHO GAVE IT

$8.2M raised

PACs & committees$3.3M· 40%

Individuals$4.9M· 60%

+ $1.8Mvia pass-through platforms (ActBlue/WinRed/party) — not counted in “raised”

WHAT IT'S TIED TO

Industry-tied$3.1M· 37%

Party & political$773K· 9%

Untraced (small donors)$4.4M· 53%

Two views of the same $8.2M — who gave it vs whatit's tied to. (Most industry money comes from PACs, so the two don't add together.)

Top sectors: Labor Unions, Lawyers & Lobbyists, Commercial Banks

Full breakdown →

DATA SOURCES

Financial: FEC · 2022–2026 cycles

Profile: Congress.gov

Votes: House Clerk / Senate · 2021–present

Lobbying: Senate LDA · 2017–present

Trades: STOCK Act disclosures · live ingestion rebuilding

117th–119th Congress. Statistical patterns only.

FUNDING PROFILE

Source breakdown · industry signal · political money — shown separately

WHO GAVE IT

$8.2M raised

PACs & committees$3.3M· 40%

Individuals$4.9M· 60%

+ $1.8Mvia pass-through platforms (ActBlue/WinRed/party) — not counted in “raised”

WHAT IT'S TIED TO

Industry-tied$3.1M· 37%

Party & political$773K· 9%

Untraced (small donors)$4.4M· 53%

Two views of the same $8.2M — who gave it vs whatit's tied to. (Most industry money comes from PACs, so the two don't add together.)

INDUSTRY SIGNAL

The $3.1M industry-tied portion, by sector

$3.1M

industry-tied

Labor Unions30.3%

Other sectors24.0%

Lawyers & Lobbyists13.7%

Commercial Banks12.1%

Health Services5.6%

Technology5.5%

Education4.6%

Real Estate4.1%

PARTY & POLITICAL

The $773Kparty/leadership & single-cause portion — not an industry signal

Party & Leadership$491K

Single-Issue Advocacy$282K

How to read this: “Raised” is direct contributions ($8.2M). We trace it to an industry or political category via PAC names and donor employers; small online donors without an employer can't be traced. Industry and political money are shown separately so the economic-interest signal isn't drowned out by party and advocacy money.

TOP SOURCES

Employers (individuals) & PACs · excludes aggregators

Individual Donors (no employer)

individuals

$2,743,130

RASKIN VICTORY FUND

PAC

$445,447

EAGLE BANK

corporation

$241,391

AMALGAMATED BANK

corporation

$87,117

DELOITTE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

PAC

$60,000

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (AAJ PAC)

PAC

$57,500

NATIONAL ACTIVE AND RETIRED FEDERAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COM (NARFE-PAC)

PAC

$54,000

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES P E O P L E

PAC

$52,500

AMERICAN UNIVERSITY

employees

$51,300

JSTREETPAC

PAC

$51,179

UNITE HERE TIP CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE

PAC

$50,000

NATIONAL BEER WHOLESALERS ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

PAC

$47,500

RECENT ACTIVITY

Most recent recorded contributions · PAC and itemized individual donors

NATIONAL BEER WHOLESALERS ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

PAC · Apr 27, 2026

+$2,500

AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (SKINPAC)

PAC · Apr 14, 2026

+$1,000

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (AAJ PAC)

PAC · Apr 7, 2026

+$2,500

BUNTING, GEORGE L. JR. (BUNTING MANAGEMENT GROUP)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$1,000

PRESSMA, DONNA (CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF NJ)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$1,000

KIRSHNER, JILL (SELF-EMPLOYED)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$3,500

SIMILAR DONOR NETWORKS

Members funded by the same industries — overlapping donor networks may reflect shared policy interests.

Cleo Fields

D-LA · House

Labor UnionsLawyers & LobbyistsCommercial Banks

→

Raja Krishnamoorthi

D-IL · House

Labor UnionsLawyers & Lobbyists

HOW WE CALCULATE THIS

Funding Profile

“Raised” counts direct contributions from PACs and itemized individual donors. The Industry Signal donut shows only money traceable to an economic sector (via PAC names and donor employers); its center dollar figure always equals the sum of its slices. Party, leadership, and single-issue money is shown separately as political money, not industry — so it can't distort the economic-interest picture.

What we exclude from “raised”

FEC memo entries (informational subtotals that double-count money already reported elsewhere) are excluded — counting them inflated totals by tens of millions per member. Pass-through platforms (WinRed/ActBlue) that bundle many small donors are also shown apart from raised totals to avoid double-counting.

Data sources

FEC Schedule A & bulk PAC filings · 2022–2026 cycles · Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings · 2017–present · Congress.gov / House Clerk voting records.

Important disclaimer

All data is sourced from public records. Analysis reflects statistical patterns only — it does not imply corruption, intent, or quid pro quo. Donor relationships show financial alignment, not control. Capitol Trail makes no claims about the motivations or character of any individual or organization.

LUBBERS, JEFFREY (AMERICAN UNIVERSITY)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$1,000

NEA FUND FOR CHILDREN AND PUBLIC EDUCATION

PAC · Mar 31, 2026

+$3,000

KIRSHNER, JILL (SELF-EMPLOYED)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$3,500

AMALGAMATED BANK

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$9,271

KIRSHNER, JILL (SELF-EMPLOYED)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$3,000

PEDAS, WANDA (RETIRED)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$3,500

FOOD SOLUTIONS ACTION PAC

PAC · Mar 31, 2026

+$1,000

BERGER, MITCHELL (BERGER SINGERMAN LLP)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$2,193

WEST, JOY C (J.C. WEST P.C.)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$1,000

AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION - COPE

PAC · Mar 31, 2026

+$2,500

NESSEL, ARIEL (NESSEL DEVELOPMENT)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$1,000

NATIONAL ACTIVE AND RETIRED FEDERAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION PAC

PAC · Mar 31, 2026

+$2,500

TYSON FOODS INC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (TYPAC)

PAC · Mar 31, 2026

+$1,000

POLITO, MELISSA S. (CIRCUIT COURT FOR ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$1,000

NATIONAL ACTIVE AND RETIRED FEDERAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION PAC

PAC · Mar 31, 2026

+$2,500

CARTWRIGHT, MATTHEW (LOWEY DANNENBERG)

Individual · Mar 30, 2026

+$1,000

Emmett Till Antilynching Act

COMING SOON

Live stock trade ingestion is being rebuilt.

We're migrating to a fresh data source for daily STOCK Act disclosures. Historical filings shown below are accurate but not currently refreshed nightly. Full real-time coverage returning shortly.

disclosures

purchases

sales

est. positions

+2 unparsed PTRs — Some older PTR filings exist as metadata only (asset details locked in PDFs). They are not included in the holdings estimate above. House-side parsing landing in a future update.

DATA SOURCES

House: housestockwatcher.com · daily-refreshed PDF parses · 2013–present

Senate: senatestockwatcher.com · daily-refreshed PDF parses · 2013–present

Required under the STOCK Act of 2012. Disclosure regime reports amount ranges, not exact share counts.

WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT

Lobbying is when companies, unions, and trade associations pay firms to influence laws and regulations — and the law requires them to disclose it. Every quarter, registrants file a report with Congress detailing who hired them, how much they spent, and which issues they pushed.

This page filters those filings to the industries that also fund this member's campaign. If commercial banks gave 30% of this member's donations and also filed 5,000 lobbying reports on bank-related issues last year, that's a financial pattern worth knowing about. It does not mean the member is corrupt — it means the industries paying to elect them are also paying to influence the laws they vote on.

101,104

Lobbying filings

that overlap top donor industries

$15.0B

Reported spend

across those filings

Donor industries

tracked here

2017–2026

Years covered

10 years

LOBBYING BY DONOR INDUSTRY

only industries that also fund this member

Each row = an industry that donated to this member AND has lobbyists pushing on Congress. Bar width = reported lobbying spend.

Health Services

46,475 filings$4.9B

Securities & Investment

19,298 filings$4.2B

Technology

20,580 filings$3.3B

Commercial Banks

8,039 filings$1.3B

TOP LOBBYING FIRMS

The firms doing the most spending in this member's donor industries

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.

14 filings

$242.0M

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS

12 filings

$159.5M

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA

13 filings

$113.6M

AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

14 filings

$91.7M

THE BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE, INC.

13 filings

$76.3M

Real Estate

5,781 filings$710.6M

Legal Services

931 filings$571.0M

LOBBYING SPEND BY YEAR

How much lobbyists in this member's donor industries have reported spending each year

2017

23,447$2.6B

2018

5,388$628.0M

2019

5,390$582.4M

2020

8,543$778.8M

2021

5,847$579.0M

2022

6,020$634.6M

2023

8,295$823.4M

2024

8,664$840.0M

2025

7,402$841.0M

2026

8,367$932.8M

YEARspend ($)filingsreported $

GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY

15 filings

AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION

13 filings

$68.7M

SOUTHERN COMPANY

21 filings

$65.9M

SOURCES & CAVEATS

Data: LDA (Lobbying Disclosure Act) quarterly filings · 2017–present

Amounts are self-reported by registrants. Issue codes are mapped from the LDA's 80+ general issue codes to our 19-industry taxonomy.

An industry showing up here means it both (a) funds this member's campaign and (b) lobbies Congress on issues affecting it. That overlap is a factual pattern, not proof of any quid-pro-quo.