D-CA·U.S. House·District 2

Jared Huffman

huffman.house.gov ↗View in graph ↗⇄ Compare

$3.5M

raised· #165 in party

votes recorded

—

SOON

trade disclosures

votes with party· loyal

TRAIL AI

auto-generated

Huffman's fundraising profile is heavily reliant on PAC and committee money, which accounts for 72 percent of his $3.5 million total raised, with individual donors comprising 28 percent of contributions. Industry-tied PAC money is dominated by labor unions at 37 percent of sector funding, followed by transportation, agriculture, and commercial banking each representing smaller shares; his individual donors work primarily in law, real estate, and banking. His voting record shows 331 recorded votes with no stock trading disclosures on file.

Based on FEC donor data and voting records. Statistical patterns only — does not imply causation.

DONOR MIX

Industry shares of CLASSIFIED contributions only · the long tail of small-dollar individual donors isn't tagged

$2.2M

tagged $

Labor Unions43.3%

Single-Issue Advocacy11.7%

Transportation9.3%

Agriculture9.1%

Commercial Banks8.4%

Casinos & Gambling6.8%

Lawyers & Lobbyists6.0%

Electric Utilities5.4%

How to read this: percentages are shares of the 63% of contributions we can trace to an industry (via PAC names and donor employers). Most political money comes from small online donors who don't list an employer, so it can't be traced — that portion isn't shown here.

DATA SOURCES

Financial: FEC · 2022–2026 cycles

Profile: Congress.gov

Votes: House Clerk / Senate · 2021–present

Lobbying: Senate LDA · 2017–present

Trades: STOCK Act disclosures · live ingestion rebuilding

117th–119th Congress. Statistical patterns only.

DONOR MIX

Industry shares of CLASSIFIED contributions only · hover a slice for detail

$3.5M

classified

Labor Unions43.3%

Single-Issue Advocacy11.7%

Transportation9.3%

Agriculture9.1%

Commercial Banks8.4%

Casinos & Gambling6.8%

Lawyers & Lobbyists6.0%

Electric Utilities5.4%

TOP SOURCES

Employers (individuals) & PACs · excludes aggregators

Individual Donors (no employer)

individuals

$496,988

REDWOOD CREDIT UNION

corporation

$109,333

GREEN DIAMOND RESOURCE COMPANY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

PAC

$39,500

AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

PAC

$30,000

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES P E O P L E

PAC

$30,000

MACHINISTS NON PARTISAN POLITICAL LEAGUE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPACE WORKERS

PAC

$30,000

UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION ACTIVE BALLOT CLUB

PAC

$29,000

ALLIED PILOTS ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

PAC

$28,500

CLEANPAC

PAC

$25,000

CLEAN PAC

PAC

$25,000

NATIONAL AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATION PAC

PAC

$25,000

NATIONAL AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

PAC

$25,000

RECENT ACTIVITY

Most recent recorded contributions · PAC and itemized individual donors

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (AAJ PAC)

PAC · Apr 18, 2026

+$2,500

CORNELIUS, CRAIG (CLEARWAY ENERGY GROUP)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$3,500

SHOR, ALIX (N/A)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$50

ROSENTHAL, SUSAN (N/A)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$50

SHANAHAN, CONNIE (N/A)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$250

CROSSE, LIZA (COUNTY OF MARIN)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$250

SIMILAR DONOR NETWORKS

Members funded by the same industries — overlapping donor networks may reflect shared policy interests.

Mark DeSaulnier

D-CA · House

Labor UnionsSingle-Issue AdvocacyTransportation

→

Mark Pocan

D-WI · House

Labor UnionsSingle-Issue Advocacy

HOW WE CALCULATE THIS

Donor Mix Donut

Shows PAC contributions and employer-attributed individual donations grouped by industry — as a share of classified giving only. Contributions that could not be matched to an industry are excluded from the donut but included in the dollar totals above. Advocacy/ideological PACs are excluded from industry breakdown.

What are aggregators?

WinRed, ActBlue, and similar platforms bundle contributions from many individual donors before passing them to campaigns. Because these don't represent a single entity's interests, they are excluded from the Donor Mix and Top Sources views — but they are counted in total fundraising figures.

Data sources

FEC Schedule A & bulk PAC filings · 2022–2026 cycles · Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings · 2017–present · Congress.gov / House Clerk voting records.

Important disclaimer

All data is sourced from public records. Analysis reflects statistical patterns only — it does not imply corruption, intent, or quid pro quo. Donor relationships show financial alignment, not control. Capitol Trail makes no claims about the motivations or character of any individual or organization.

BARRETT, TERESA (N/A)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

ANDERSON, BOB (SFITCH CONSULTING LLC)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$250

THE TULALIP TRIBES OF WASHINGTON

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$2,500

SMITH, MARGARET (N/A)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$1,000

REDWOOD CREDIT UNION

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$2,859

CONLEY, MARYSUSAN (N/A)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$250

GREENE, NONIE (GREENE COMPANIES, INC.)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$1,000

NATIONAL BEER WHOLESALER ASSOCIATION (NWBA PAC)

PAC · Mar 31, 2026

+$1,000

SALT RIVER VALLEY WATER USERS' ASSOCIATION POLITICAL INVOLVEMENT COMMITTEE (SRPPIC)

PAC · Mar 31, 2026

+$2,500

VISICK, JANET (N/A)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$100

COMING SOON

Live stock trade ingestion is being rebuilt.

We're migrating to a fresh data source for daily STOCK Act disclosures. Historical filings shown below are accurate but not currently refreshed nightly. Full real-time coverage returning shortly.

No historical stock trade disclosures on file for this member.

WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT

Lobbying is when companies, unions, and trade associations pay firms to influence laws and regulations — and the law requires them to disclose it. Every quarter, registrants file a report with Congress detailing who hired them, how much they spent, and which issues they pushed.

This page filters those filings to the industries that also fund this member's campaign. If commercial banks gave 30% of this member's donations and also filed 5,000 lobbying reports on bank-related issues last year, that's a financial pattern worth knowing about. It does not mean the member is corrupt — it means the industries paying to elect them are also paying to influence the laws they vote on.

27,781

Lobbying filings

that overlap top donor industries

$3.8B

Reported spend

across those filings

Donor industries

tracked here

2017–2026

Years covered

10 years

LOBBYING BY DONOR INDUSTRY

only industries that also fund this member

Each row = an industry that donated to this member AND has lobbyists pushing on Congress. Bar width = reported lobbying spend.

Agriculture

15,305 filings$1.5B

Commercial Banks

8,039 filings$1.3B

Legal Services

931 filings$571.0M

Utilities

2,185 filings$309.8M

TOP LOBBYING FIRMS

The firms doing the most spending in this member's donor industries

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.

14 filings

$242.0M

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS

6 filings

$80.5M

SOUTHERN COMPANY

21 filings

$65.9M

AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

10 filings

$63.0M

U.S. CHAMBER INSTITUTE FOR LEGAL REFORM

7 filings

$41.7M

Gambling

1,321 filings$84.0M

LOBBYING SPEND BY YEAR

How much lobbyists in this member's donor industries have reported spending each year

2017

7,138$962.7M

2018

1,671$234.8M

2019

1,642$189.9M

2020

2,532$284.7M

2021

1,588$178.8M

2022

1,683$189.2M

2023

2,752$297.1M

2024

2,763$299.0M

2025

2,348$283.3M

2026

2,586$310.9M

YEARspend ($)filingsreported $

AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION

15 filings

KOCH GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, LLC

12 filings

$32.7M

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS

14 filings

$31.6M

SOURCES & CAVEATS

Data: LDA (Lobbying Disclosure Act) quarterly filings · 2017–present

Amounts are self-reported by registrants. Issue codes are mapped from the LDA's 80+ general issue codes to our 19-industry taxonomy.

An industry showing up here means it both (a) funds this member's campaign and (b) lobbies Congress on issues affecting it. That overlap is a factual pattern, not proof of any quid-pro-quo.