THE TAKETrailAI · auto-generated
Crockett's fundraising profile is heavily weighted toward individual donors, who account for 93 percent of her $17.7 million in direct contributions, with PACs and committees representing only 7 percent. Among industry-tied contributions, her donor base shows concentration in legal and lobbying services (30 percent of industry money), technology (10 percent), and health services (10 percent), patterns that align with her individual donor base, which includes workers in law, healthcare, and government sectors. She has no recorded stock trades on file and maintains a voting record of 145 recorded votes.
Raised · all cycles$17.7M▲ 227% in ’24 vs ’22#11 in party · by cycle ↴
Top sector share30%Lawyers & Lobbyists
Donor-sector votes7on bills touching top donor sectors
FOLLOW THE MONEY
Left: who funds Crockett (ribbon width = dollars) · right: their votes on bills classified as favoring vs limiting those sectors
“Favors / limits” is an AI classification of each bill's likely effect on the sector — a factual reading of the bill, not a claim about motive. Correlation, not causation. The named bills are in DOES THE MONEY MATCH THE VOTES? below.
DOES THE MONEY MATCH THE VOTES?
How Crockett voted on bills touching their biggest donor sectors · 6 of 7 shown, ranked by sector money
Each dollar figure is Crockett's total from that donor sector — shown on each related vote, not a per-vote amount. Correlation between funding and votes, not causation; many factors shape any single vote.
TOP SOURCES
1$217K
PROTECT OUR FUTURE PAC
PAC
2$175K
WEB3 FORWARD
PAC
3$83K
TEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
PAC
4$65K
WORKING FAMILIES PARTY PAC
PAC
5$58K
AME CHURCH
employees
ALIGNMENT SIGNALS
Lobbying–Donor Overlap82%
Jasmine Crockett (D) voted NAY sjres28-119; Technology is their largest tracked donor sector (24%) with 9611 active lobbying filings
This joint resolution would nullify a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau rule that subjects larger digital payment app companies to federal supervisory authority in the Technology industry. Representative Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) voted NAY on sjres28-119. Technology comprises 24.2% of her identifiable donor base ($2.47M, ranking #2 among her party), while Technology companies filed 9,611 lobbying reports since 2022 related to this legislation.
Grassroots Funding81%
Jasmine Crockett raised 68% from sub-$200 small-dollar donors — #2 most grassroots-funded in the House
68% of the $17.7M in contributions Jasmine Crockett raised across the tracked cycles came from donors giving under $200 — the FEC's "unitemized" small-dollar tier — ranking #2 of 415 House members raising over $1M. Small-dollar totals are reported by campaigns directly to the FEC; individual donors below $200 are not itemized by law.
Sector-Aligned Voting70%
Jasmine Crockett (D) voted YEA on just 1 of 4 bills classified as favoring their own donor sectors
Rep. Jasmine Crockett voted in favor of 1 of 4 bills classified as benefiting her top donor sectors including Technology and Securities & Investment (25%). She voted against the Building Chips in America Act of 2023, classified as favoring the Technology sector, while voting to support both bills classified as limiting those same sectors.
COMMITTEES
Judiciary
Oversight and Government Reform
House Select Subcommittee to Investigate the Remaining Questions Surrounding January 6, 2021
SIMILAR DONOR NETWORKS
Members funded by the same industries — overlapping donor networks may reflect shared policy interests.
Edward J. Markey
D-MA · Senate
Lawyers & LobbyistsTechnologyHealth Services
Alex Padilla
D-CA · Senate
Lawyers & LobbyistsTechnologyHealth Services
Jason Crow
D-CO · House
Lawyers & LobbyistsTechnologyHealth Services
Andy Kim
D-NJ · Senate
Lawyers & LobbyistsTechnologyHealth Services
Ted Lieu
D-CA · House
Lawyers & LobbyistsTechnologyHealth Services
Jeff Merkley
D-OR · Senate
Lawyers & LobbyistsTechnologyHealth Services