$4.3M
raised· #46 in party
0
votes recorded
—
SOONtrade disclosures
0%
votes with party· loyal
$4.3M
raised· #46 in party
0
votes recorded
—
SOONtrade disclosures
0%
votes with party· loyal
SIMILAR DONOR NETWORKS
Members funded by the same industries — overlapping donor networks may reflect shared policy interests.
Mary E. Miller
R-IL · House
George Latimer
D-NY · House
Mike Haridopolos
R-FL · House
Terri A. Sewell
D-AL · House
Tim Kaine
D-VA · Senate
Wesley Bell
D-MO · House
FUNDING PROFILE
Where the money comes from · what it's tied to
WHO GAVE IT
$4.3M raised
WHAT IT'S TIED TO
Two views of the same $4.3M — who gave it vs whatit's tied to. (Most industry money comes from PACs, so the two don't add together.) Untraced includes sub-$200 donors (FEC requires no itemization) and itemized donors whose employer couldn't be classified.
Top sectors: Lawyers & Lobbyists, Securities & Investment, Health Services
Full breakdown →TOP DONORS
Largest contributors · employers & PACs
ASHLEY MOODY VICTORY FUND
PAC
Individual Donors (no employer)
individuals
SECURE THE US SENATE 2026
PAC
SENATE CONSERVATIVES FUND
PAC
ONE TEAM SENATE MAJORITY
PAC
DATA SOURCES
Financial: FEC · FEC reporting periods 2021–2026
Profile: Congress.gov
Votes: House Clerk / Senate · 2021–present
Lobbying: Senate LDA · 2017–present
Trades: STOCK Act disclosures · live ingestion rebuilding
117th–119th Congress. Statistical patterns only.
FUNDING PROFILE
Source breakdown · industry signal · political money — shown separately
WHO GAVE IT
$4.3M raised
WHAT IT'S TIED TO
Two views of the same $4.3M — who gave it vs whatit's tied to. (Most industry money comes from PACs, so the two don't add together.) Untraced includes sub-$200 donors (FEC requires no itemization) and itemized donors whose employer couldn't be classified.
INDUSTRY SIGNAL
The $4.0M industry-tied portion, by sector
$4.0M
industry-tied
PARTY & POLITICAL
The $4.9Mparty/leadership & single-cause portion — not an industry signal
How to read this: “Raised” is direct contributions ($4.3M). We trace it to an industry or political category via PAC names and donor employers; small online donors without an employer can't be traced. Industry and political money are shown separately so the economic-interest signal isn't drowned out by party and advocacy money.
TOP SOURCES
Employers (individuals) & PACs · excludes aggregators
ASHLEY MOODY VICTORY FUND
PAC
Individual Donors (no employer)
individuals
SECURE THE US SENATE 2026
PAC
SENATE CONSERVATIVES FUND
PAC
ONE TEAM SENATE MAJORITY
PAC
GOP WINNING WOMEN 2026
PAC
FRIENDS OF KENNEDY
PAC
THE VILLAGES
employees
KEEP THE SENATE
PAC
LAW ENFORCEMENT FOR A SAFER AMERICA PAC
PAC
KEEP THE SENATE RED 2026
PAC
RDV CORPORATION
employees
RECENT ACTIVITY
Most recent recorded contributions · PAC and itemized individual donors
AMERICAN OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
PAC · Apr 28, 2026
ENGINEERING AND SOFTWARE SYSTEMS SOLUTIONS, INC. PAC
PAC · Apr 23, 2026
ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP (APKS) PARTNERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
PAC · Apr 22, 2026
AMERICAN MARITIME OFFICERS VOLUNTARY POLITICAL ACTION FUND
PAC · Apr 9, 2026
CONSTRUCTION PARTNERS, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
PAC · Apr 2, 2026
ALKERMES, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
PAC · Mar 31, 2026
SIMILAR DONOR NETWORKS
Members funded by the same industries — overlapping donor networks may reflect shared policy interests.
HOW WE CALCULATE THIS
Funding Profile
“Raised” is the FEC's official candidate total: individual contributions (itemized + unitemized) + PAC contributions + party contributions, summed across FEC reporting periods 2021–2026. It excludes loans, transfers from joint fundraising committees, and candidate self-funding. The Industry Signal donut shows only money traceable to an economic sector (via PAC names and donor employers); its center dollar figure always equals the sum of its slices. Party, leadership, and single-issue money is shown separately as political money, not industry — so it can't distort the economic-interest picture.
What we exclude from “raised”
FEC memo entries (informational subtotals that double-count money already reported elsewhere) are excluded — counting them inflated totals by tens of millions per member. Pass-through platforms (WinRed/ActBlue) that bundle many small donors are also shown apart from raised totals to avoid double-counting.
Data sources
FEC Schedule A & bulk PAC filings · FEC reporting periods 2021–2026 · Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings · 2017–present · Congress.gov / House Clerk voting records.
Important disclaimer
All data is sourced from public records. Analysis reflects statistical patterns only — it does not imply corruption, intent, or quid pro quo. Donor relationships show financial alignment, not control. Capitol Trail makes no claims about the motivations or character of any individual or organization.
ABBVIE PAC
PAC · Mar 31, 2026
NATIONAL MARINE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION AND MARINE RETAILERS ASSOCIATION BOAT PAC
PAC · Mar 31, 2026
KINTZ, JUSTIN A. (FORBES TATE PARTNERS)
Individual · Mar 31, 2026
ASTELLAS US LLC PAC (ASTELLAS PAC)
PAC · Mar 31, 2026
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY PAC
PAC · Mar 31, 2026
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC SEPARATE SEGREGATED FUND (AMAZON PAC)
PAC · Mar 31, 2026
HOLLINS, LEONA JEAN (NONE)
Individual · Mar 31, 2026
PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
PAC · Mar 31, 2026
EMPLOYEES OF NORTHROP GRUMMAN
PAC · Mar 31, 2026
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (BSC PAC)
PAC · Mar 31, 2026
SANOFI US SERVICES INC. EMPLOYEES' POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
PAC · Mar 31, 2026
GLAUKOS IPAC
PAC · Mar 31, 2026
SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
PAC · Mar 31, 2026
GOP WINNING WOMEN 2026
PAC · Mar 31, 2026
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC SEPARATE SEGREGATED FUND (AMAZON PAC)
PAC · Mar 31, 2026
SANOFI US SERVICES INC. EMPLOYEES' POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
PAC · Mar 31, 2026
SALTCHUK RESOURCES, INC. PAC
PAC · Mar 31, 2026
REYNOLDS AMERICAN INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
PAC · Mar 31, 2026
ABBVIE PAC
PAC · Mar 31, 2026
Live stock trade ingestion is being rebuilt.
We're migrating to a fresh data source for daily STOCK Act disclosures. Historical filings shown below are accurate but not currently refreshed nightly. Full real-time coverage returning shortly.
No historical stock trade disclosures on file for this member.
WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT
Lobbying is when companies, unions, and trade associations pay firms to influence laws and regulations — and the law requires them to disclose it. Every quarter, registrants file a report with Congress detailing who hired them, how much they spent, and which issues they pushed.
This page filters those filings to the industries that also fund this member's campaign. If commercial banks gave 30% of this member's donations and also filed 5,000 lobbying reports on bank-related issues last year, that's a financial pattern worth knowing about. It does not mean the member is corrupt — it means the industries paying to elect them are also paying to influence the laws they vote on.
81,655
Lobbying filings
that overlap top donor industries
$13.7B
Reported spend
across those filings
8
Donor industries
tracked here
2017–2026
Years covered
10 years
LOBBYING BY DONOR INDUSTRY
Each row = an industry that donated to this member AND has lobbyists pushing on Congress. Bar width = reported lobbying spend.
TOP LOBBYING FIRMS
The firms doing the most spending in this member's donor industries
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
7 filings
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.
14 filings
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS
12 filings
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA
13 filings
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
14 filings
LOBBYING SPEND BY YEAR
How much lobbyists in this member's donor industries have reported spending each year
THE BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE, INC.
13 filings
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY
15 filings
AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
13 filings
SOURCES & CAVEATS
Data: LDA (Lobbying Disclosure Act) quarterly filings · 2017–present
Amounts are self-reported by registrants. Issue codes are mapped from the LDA's 80+ general issue codes to our 19-industry taxonomy.
An industry showing up here means it both (a) funds this member's campaign and (b) lobbies Congress on issues affecting it. That overlap is a factual pattern, not proof of any quid-pro-quo.