D-NY·U.S. House·District 22

John W. Mannion

mannion.house.gov/ ↗View in graph ↗⇄ Compare

$7.2M

raised· #96 in party

votes recorded

—

SOON

trade disclosures

votes with party· loyal

TRAIL AI

auto-generated

Mannion's $7.2M fundraising profile is heavily reliant on PACs and committees, which account for 60% of contributions, with $2.1M from party and leadership committees. Labor unions dominate his industry-tied donor base at 49%, followed by smaller shares from securities and investment, health services, lawyers and lobbyists, and education sectors. His individual donor base similarly reflects concentration in securities and investment, education, and legal services, suggesting these professional communities form a meaningful portion of his non-PAC support.

Based on FEC donor data and voting records. Statistical patterns only — does not imply causation.

DONOR MIX

Industry shares of CLASSIFIED contributions only · the long tail of small-dollar individual donors isn't tagged

$3.4M

tagged $

Party & Leadership34.7%

Labor Unions28.3%

Single-Issue Advocacy22.0%

Securities & Investment3.6%

Health Services3.4%

Lawyers & Lobbyists3.1%

Education2.6%

Agriculture2.4%

How to read this: percentages are shares of the 47% of contributions we can trace to an industry (via PAC names and donor employers). Most political money comes from small online donors who don't list an employer, so it can't be traced — that portion isn't shown here.

DATA SOURCES

Financial: FEC · 2022–2026 cycles

Profile: Congress.gov

Votes: House Clerk / Senate · 2021–present

Lobbying: Senate LDA · 2017–present

Trades: STOCK Act disclosures ·

live ingestion rebuilding

117th–119th Congress. Statistical patterns only.

DONOR MIX

Industry shares of CLASSIFIED contributions only · hover a slice for detail

$7.2M

classified

Party & Leadership34.7%

Labor Unions28.3%

Single-Issue Advocacy22.0%

Securities & Investment3.6%

Health Services3.4%

Lawyers & Lobbyists3.1%

Education2.6%

Agriculture2.4%

TOP SOURCES

Employers (individuals) & PACs · excludes aggregators

Individual Donors (no employer)

individuals

$1,486,195

BATTLEGROUND NEW YORK

PAC

$381,698

CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP FUND

PAC

$192,809

NY COMMON GROUND

PAC

$173,305

NEA ADVOCACY FUND

PAC

$149,990

LCV VICTORY FUND

PAC

$143,589

JSTREETPAC

PAC

$105,527

AFT SOLIDARITY

PAC

$92,500

EMPIRE STATE STRIKES BACK

PAC

$60,199

NEW DEMOCRAT COALITION ACTION FUND

PAC

$55,500

JEFFRIES BATTLEGROUND PROTECTION FUND

PAC

$52,392

CANAL PARTNERS MEDIA

corporation

$52,040

RECENT ACTIVITY

Most recent recorded contributions · PAC and itemized individual donors

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS POLITICAL ACTION LEAGUE

PAC · Apr 29, 2026

+$2,500

SALT RIVER VALLEY WATER USERS' ASSOCIATION POLITICAL INVOLVEMENT COMMITTEE ( SRPPIC)

PAC · Apr 8, 2026

+$1,000

RAYNOR, GEOFFREY P. (Q INVESTMENTS)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$1,708

SOSNOFF, HADLEY (SELF-EMPLOYED)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$1,500

RAYNOR, MONTANA C. (NOT EMPLOYED)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$1,708

GREEN ON TOP PAC

PAC · Mar 31, 2026

+$2,000

SIMILAR DONOR NETWORKS

Members funded by the same industries — overlapping donor networks may reflect shared policy interests.

Greg Landsman

D-OH · House

Party & LeadershipLabor UnionsSingle-Issue Advocacy

→

Elissa Slotkin

D-MI · Senate

Party & LeadershipLabor Unions

HOW WE CALCULATE THIS

Donor Mix Donut

Shows PAC contributions and employer-attributed individual donations grouped by industry — as a share of classified giving only. Contributions that could not be matched to an industry are excluded from the donut but included in the dollar totals above. Advocacy/ideological PACs are excluded from industry breakdown.

What are aggregators?

WinRed, ActBlue, and similar platforms bundle contributions from many individual donors before passing them to campaigns. Because these don't represent a single entity's interests, they are excluded from the Donor Mix and Top Sources views — but they are counted in total fundraising figures.

Data sources

FEC Schedule A & bulk PAC filings · 2022–2026 cycles · Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings · 2017–present · Congress.gov / House Clerk voting records.

Important disclaimer

All data is sourced from public records. Analysis reflects statistical patterns only — it does not imply corruption, intent, or quid pro quo. Donor relationships show financial alignment, not control. Capitol Trail makes no claims about the motivations or character of any individual or organization.

JACOBY, HELEN (NOT EMPLOYED)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$3,500

RAUTIO, JAMES (NOT EMPLOYED)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$3,500

JEFFRIES BATTLEGROUND PROTECTION FUND

PAC · Mar 31, 2026

+$9,733

PERRY, CLAIRE (SELF-EMPLOYED)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$3,500

SMITH, JANET (NOT EMPLOYED)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$2,500

COGSWELL, KATHERINE (LE MOYNE COLLEGE)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$3,500

BAKER, BRENDA (NOT EMPLOYED)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$3,500

TEACHERS INSURANCE ANNUITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA PAC

PAC · Mar 31, 2026

+$2,500

ELECT DEMS NOW PAC

PAC · Mar 31, 2026

+$2,000

AMPAC

PAC · Mar 31, 2026

+$2,000

GREEN ON TOP PAC

PAC · Mar 31, 2026

+$5,000

RAUTIO, JAMES (NOT EMPLOYED)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$7,000

MILOSKY, LINDA (SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY)

Individual · Mar 31, 2026

+$2,000

Single-Issue Advocacy

COMING SOON

Live stock trade ingestion is being rebuilt.

We're migrating to a fresh data source for daily STOCK Act disclosures. Historical filings shown below are accurate but not currently refreshed nightly. Full real-time coverage returning shortly.

No historical stock trade disclosures on file for this member.

WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT

Lobbying is when companies, unions, and trade associations pay firms to influence laws and regulations — and the law requires them to disclose it. Every quarter, registrants file a report with Congress detailing who hired them, how much they spent, and which issues they pushed.

This page filters those filings to the industries that also fund this member's campaign. If commercial banks gave 30% of this member's donations and also filed 5,000 lobbying reports on bank-related issues last year, that's a financial pattern worth knowing about. It does not mean the member is corrupt — it means the industries paying to elect them are also paying to influence the laws they vote on.

82,009

Lobbying filings

that overlap top donor industries

$11.2B

Reported spend

across those filings

Donor industries

tracked here

2017–2026

Years covered

10 years

LOBBYING BY DONOR INDUSTRY

only industries that also fund this member

Each row = an industry that donated to this member AND has lobbyists pushing on Congress. Bar width = reported lobbying spend.

Health Services

46,475 filings$4.9B

Securities & Investment

19,298 filings$4.2B

Agriculture

15,305 filings$1.5B

Legal Services

931 filings$571.0M

TOP LOBBYING FIRMS

The firms doing the most spending in this member's donor industries

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.

14 filings

$242.0M

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS

12 filings

$159.5M

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA

13 filings

$113.6M

AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

14 filings

$91.7M

THE BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE, INC.

13 filings

$76.3M

LOBBYING SPEND BY YEAR

How much lobbyists in this member's donor industries have reported spending each year

2017

20,913$2.4B

2018

4,777$568.7M

2019

4,632$505.8M

2020

7,509$689.2M

2021

4,996$498.4M

2022

5,182$552.0M

2023

7,283$724.4M

2024

7,493$717.4M

2025

6,377$717.7M

2026

7,106$814.8M

YEARspend ($)filingsreported $

GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY

15 filings

AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION

13 filings

$68.7M

AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC

14 filings

$56.3M

SOURCES & CAVEATS

Data: LDA (Lobbying Disclosure Act) quarterly filings · 2017–present

Amounts are self-reported by registrants. Issue codes are mapped from the LDA's 80+ general issue codes to our 19-industry taxonomy.

An industry showing up here means it both (a) funds this member's campaign and (b) lobbies Congress on issues affecting it. That overlap is a factual pattern, not proof of any quid-pro-quo.