R-GA·U.S. House·District 3

Brian Jack

jack.house.gov/ ↗View in graph ↗⇄ Compare

$297K

raised· #214 in party

votes recorded

—

SOON

trade disclosures

votes with party· loyal

TRAIL AI

auto-generated

Jack's fundraising profile is heavily weighted toward individual donors, who account for 92 percent of his $297K in direct contributions, with PACs and committees comprising just 8 percent. Industry-tied contributions cluster in government sector work (43 percent), followed by commercial banking (22 percent) and securities and investment services (13 percent), patterns reflected among his individual donors' stated employment as well. His voting record spans 52 recorded votes with no stock trade disclosures on file.

Based on FEC donor data and voting records. Statistical patterns only — does not imply causation.

DONOR MIX

Industry shares of CLASSIFIED contributions only · the long tail of small-dollar individual donors isn't tagged

$117K

tagged $

Government45.4%

Commercial Banks23.4%

Securities & Investment13.5%

Oil & Gas5.1%

Health Services3.6%

Casinos & Gambling3.0%

Food & Beverage3.0%

Electric Utilities3.0%

How to read this: percentages are shares of the 39% of contributions we can trace to an industry (via PAC names and donor employers). Most political money comes from small online donors who don't list an employer, so it can't be traced — that portion isn't shown here.

DATA SOURCES

Financial: FEC · 2022–2026 cycles

Profile: Congress.gov

Votes: House Clerk / Senate · 2021–present

Lobbying: Senate LDA · 2017–present

Trades: STOCK Act disclosures · live ingestion rebuilding

117th–119th Congress. Statistical patterns only.

DONOR MIX

Industry shares of CLASSIFIED contributions only · hover a slice for detail

$297K

classified

Government45.4%

Commercial Banks23.4%

Securities & Investment13.5%

Oil & Gas5.1%

Health Services3.6%

Casinos & Gambling3.0%

Food & Beverage3.0%

Electric Utilities3.0%

TOP SOURCES

Employers (individuals) & PACs · excludes aggregators

Individual Donors (no employer)

individuals

$53,617

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

employees

$28,000

DEEP TECH GO TO MARKET

employees

$14,300

FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK TRUST

employees

$14,000

STATE OF OHIO

employees

$14,000

NACCO NATURAL RESOURCES

employees

$10,000

BEAMAN VENTURES

employees

$8,000

STATE OF TENNESSEE

employees

$7,500

GARVER ENGINEERING

employees

$7,000

MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE

employees

$7,000

SNC

employees

$7,000

USA

employees

$7,000

RECENT ACTIVITY

Most recent recorded contributions · PAC and itemized individual donors

BRAY, PETER (BRAY COMPANIES INC.)

Individual · Mar 7, 2026

+$500

HAAKENSON, BLAKE

Individual · Mar 7, 2026

+$521

BNSF RAILPAC

PAC · Mar 7, 2026

+$1,021

RICE, TOM

Individual · Mar 6, 2026

+$300

BRAY, PETER (BRAY COMPANIES INC.)

Individual · Mar 6, 2026

+$2,500

AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

PAC · Mar 5, 2026

+$521

DENNIS, DONALD (ARCHWAY INVESTMENTS)

SIMILAR DONOR NETWORKS

Members funded by the same industries — overlapping donor networks may reflect shared policy interests.

James Lankford

R-OK · Senate

Commercial BanksSecurities & InvestmentOil & Gas

→

John Barrasso

R-WY · Senate

Commercial BanksSecurities & Investment

HOW WE CALCULATE THIS

Donor Mix Donut

Shows PAC contributions and employer-attributed individual donations grouped by industry — as a share of classified giving only. Contributions that could not be matched to an industry are excluded from the donut but included in the dollar totals above. Advocacy/ideological PACs are excluded from industry breakdown.

What are aggregators?

WinRed, ActBlue, and similar platforms bundle contributions from many individual donors before passing them to campaigns. Because these don't represent a single entity's interests, they are excluded from the Donor Mix and Top Sources views — but they are counted in total fundraising figures.

Data sources

FEC Schedule A & bulk PAC filings · 2022–2026 cycles · Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings · 2017–present · Congress.gov / House Clerk voting records.

Important disclaimer

All data is sourced from public records. Analysis reflects statistical patterns only — it does not imply corruption, intent, or quid pro quo. Donor relationships show financial alignment, not control. Capitol Trail makes no claims about the motivations or character of any individual or organization.

Individual · Mar 5, 2026

AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION PAC

PAC · Feb 28, 2026

+$521

PARRISH, NORMAN (RETIRED)

Individual · Feb 28, 2026

+$521

FLOURNOY, CHARLES (RETIRED)

Individual · Feb 27, 2026

+$208

SARDO, VICTORIA (RETIRED)

Individual · Feb 26, 2026

+$104

SWITAJ, MARK (RETIRED)

Individual · Feb 26, 2026

+$1,041

GORDON, LISA (RETIRED)

Individual · Feb 26, 2026

−$3,500

GRANDE, TONY (CORECIVIC)

Individual · Feb 26, 2026

+$3,500

BENDER, SUSIE (NOT EMPLOYED)

Individual · Feb 25, 2026

−$500

SCHNEIDER, THOMAS (NMSP)

Individual · Feb 25, 2026

+$1,000

WRIGHT, RICK (VUMC)

Individual · Feb 25, 2026

+$500

HARVEY, AUBREY TODD (BYERS HARVEY INC.)

Individual · Feb 25, 2026

+$2,000

BERTHAUD, VLADIMIR M.D. (MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE)

Individual · Feb 24, 2026

+$7,000

HARRINGTON, CORDIA W. (THE BAKERY COMPANIES)

Individual · Feb 24, 2026

+$260

LEWIS, SAM J. JR. (AMERIS HEALTH SYSTEMS)

Individual · Feb 22, 2026

+$208

COMING SOON

Live stock trade ingestion is being rebuilt.

We're migrating to a fresh data source for daily STOCK Act disclosures. Historical filings shown below are accurate but not currently refreshed nightly. Full real-time coverage returning shortly.

No historical stock trade disclosures on file for this member.

WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT

Lobbying is when companies, unions, and trade associations pay firms to influence laws and regulations — and the law requires them to disclose it. Every quarter, registrants file a report with Congress detailing who hired them, how much they spent, and which issues they pushed.

This page filters those filings to the industries that also fund this member's campaign. If commercial banks gave 30% of this member's donations and also filed 5,000 lobbying reports on bank-related issues last year, that's a financial pattern worth knowing about. It does not mean the member is corrupt — it means the industries paying to elect them are also paying to influence the laws they vote on.

93,878

Lobbying filings

that overlap top donor industries

$14.6B

Reported spend

across those filings

Donor industries

tracked here

2017–2026

Years covered

10 years

LOBBYING BY DONOR INDUSTRY

only industries that also fund this member

Each row = an industry that donated to this member AND has lobbyists pushing on Congress. Bar width = reported lobbying spend.

Health Services

46,475 filings$4.9B

Securities & Investment

19,298 filings$4.2B

Oil & Gas

16,560 filings$3.7B

Commercial Banks

8,039 filings$1.3B

TOP LOBBYING FIRMS

The firms doing the most spending in this member's donor industries

WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.

7 filings

$1.0B

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.

14 filings

$242.0M

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS

12 filings

$159.5M

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA

13 filings

$113.6M

AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

14 filings

$91.7M

Utilities

2,185 filings$309.8M

Gambling

1,321 filings$84.0M

LOBBYING SPEND BY YEAR

How much lobbyists in this member's donor industries have reported spending each year

2017

23,592$3.7B

2018

5,340$636.1M

2019

5,250$585.4M

2020

8,390$787.4M

2021

5,657$567.9M

2022

5,830$616.2M

2023

7,941$815.1M

2024

8,250$836.2M

2025

7,075$845.6M

2026

7,824$913.7M

YEARspend ($)filingsreported $

THE BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE, INC.

13 filings

GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY

15 filings

$69.4M

AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION

13 filings

$68.7M

SOURCES & CAVEATS

Data: LDA (Lobbying Disclosure Act) quarterly filings · 2017–present

Amounts are self-reported by registrants. Issue codes are mapped from the LDA's 80+ general issue codes to our 19-industry taxonomy.

An industry showing up here means it both (a) funds this member's campaign and (b) lobbies Congress on issues affecting it. That overlap is a factual pattern, not proof of any quid-pro-quo.