
$1.5M
raised· #201 in party
0
votes recorded
—
SOONtrade disclosures
0%
votes with party· loyal
TRAIL AI
Representative McIver's funding profile shows substantial reliance on PAC and committee money, which comprises 78 percent of her $1.5 million in direct contributions, with an additional $451,000 from party and leadership committees. Industry-tied PAC money is heavily concentrated in labor unions, which account for 44 percent of her industry funding, followed by smaller shares from insurance, health services, lawyers and lobbyists, and commercial banks. Individual donors in her contribution base work primarily in real estate, legal services, and insurance sectors.
Based on FEC donor data and voting records. Statistical patterns only — does not imply causation.
DONOR MIX
Industry shares of CLASSIFIED contributions only · the long tail of small-dollar individual donors isn't tagged
$878K
tagged $
DATA SOURCES
Financial: FEC · 2022–2026 cycles
Profile: Congress.gov
Votes: House Clerk / Senate · 2021–present
Lobbying: Senate LDA · 2017–present
Trades: STOCK Act disclosures ·
117th–119th Congress. Statistical patterns only.
CHRISSY HOULAHAN FOR CONGRESS
Individual · Mar 31, 2026
HAYASHIGAWA, SANDRA (NOT EMPLOYED)
Individual · Mar 31, 2026
SCAPIN, JANET KANE (NOT EMPLOYED)
Individual · Mar 31, 2026
MUHM, KATHERINE (BORO OF SOUTH BOUND BROOK)
Individual · Mar 31, 2026
CHRISSY HOULAHAN FOR CONGRESS
PAC · Mar 31, 2026
WARREN, KARMA (METRO VEIN)
Individual · Mar 31, 2026
PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC. FEDERAL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (AKA - PRUDENTIAL FEDERAL PAC
PAC · Mar 31, 2026
LINDSAY, ELLYN (NOT EMPLOYED)
Individual · Mar 30, 2026
AMERICAN OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
PAC · Mar 30, 2026
ZUCKER, ROB (WINNING STRATEGIES WASHINGTON)
Individual · Mar 30, 2026
FIRSTENERGY CORP POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
PAC · Mar 30, 2026
MOHEISEN, YOUNIS (KING'S FAMILY RESTAURANT)
Individual · Mar 30, 2026
GANNON, RICHARD (GTB PARTNERS, LLC)
Individual · Mar 30, 2026
Live stock trade ingestion is being rebuilt.
We're migrating to a fresh data source for daily STOCK Act disclosures. Historical filings shown below are accurate but not currently refreshed nightly. Full real-time coverage returning shortly.
No historical stock trade disclosures on file for this member.
WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT
Lobbying is when companies, unions, and trade associations pay firms to influence laws and regulations — and the law requires them to disclose it. Every quarter, registrants file a report with Congress detailing who hired them, how much they spent, and which issues they pushed.
This page filters those filings to the industries that also fund this member's campaign. If commercial banks gave 30% of this member's donations and also filed 5,000 lobbying reports on bank-related issues last year, that's a financial pattern worth knowing about. It does not mean the member is corrupt — it means the industries paying to elect them are also paying to influence the laws they vote on.
64,596
Lobbying filings
that overlap top donor industries
$10.1B
Reported spend
across those filings
8
Donor industries
tracked here
2017–2026
Years covered
10 years
LOBBYING BY DONOR INDUSTRY
Each row = an industry that donated to this member AND has lobbyists pushing on Congress. Bar width = reported lobbying spend.
TOP LOBBYING FIRMS
The firms doing the most spending in this member's donor industries
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
7 filings
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.
14 filings
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS
12 filings
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA
13 filings
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
14 filings
LOBBYING SPEND BY YEAR
How much lobbyists in this member's donor industries have reported spending each year
THE BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE, INC.
13 filings
AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
13 filings
PFIZER INC.
16 filings
SOURCES & CAVEATS
Data: LDA (Lobbying Disclosure Act) quarterly filings · 2017–present
Amounts are self-reported by registrants. Issue codes are mapped from the LDA's 80+ general issue codes to our 19-industry taxonomy.
An industry showing up here means it both (a) funds this member's campaign and (b) lobbies Congress on issues affecting it. That overlap is a factual pattern, not proof of any quid-pro-quo.